Toward a response to the moral chaos that surrounds us

The church is surrounded by moral chaos and we rightly feel the need to respond. It is this writer’s opinion that some of our response is not helpful. Calls for boycott and angry rhetoric about the moral decline seem to escalate the problem rather than help it. Too often we become two groups of people screaming at each other over a great divide.

Transformation of culture is not our job

Culture WarsIn my reading of the New Testament, I see no commands to transform our culture. I believe that a transformed culture is a consequence of the church fulfilling her mission and not a primary goal.

The cultural context in which the Apostle Paul wrote his epistles had many similarities to today. Homosexuality, the breakdown of the family, materialism and philosophical confusion were prevalent.

In this context, Paul writes about personal transformation (Romans 12:1-2), but I cannot find any examples of where Paul encourages the church to participate in boycotts or any other behavior intended to force Christian morality on the society at large.

The church is called to make disciples. The miracle associated with disciple making is that God transforms the hearts of those who receive the Gospel. Those with transformed hearts then behave differently in society. It is this transformation of individual hearts and behavior that transforms culture.

We are called to teach the entirely of the Bible and allow God to operate through his word. But I do not see where we are to force others into accepting our beliefs.

Preaching to the deaf

Some will intentionally distort what we say. One example is the recent brouhaha over Dan Cathy’s remarks on traditional marriage. He said nothing against homosexuals or homosexual marriage, but did make statements in favor of traditional marriage. Those who were looking for an offense found it because an exclusive claim for marriage violates their sense of fairness.

Why is this the case? Isaiah 8:13-14 gives us a clue when Isaiah writes:

It is the LORD of hosts whom you should regard as holy.
And He shall be your fear,
And He shall be your dread,
Then He shall become a sanctuary

Similarly, John Newton penned these words in his song Amazing Grace:

T’was Grace that taught…
my heart to fear.
And Grace, my fears relieved.
How precious did that Grace appear…
the hour I first believed.

The point is that until the Grace of God is operative in the people we are speaking with, they cannot understand much of what we say with regard to morality and social issues. It is grace that teaches hearts to respect a higher authority.

If you do not believe that God or anyone else has the authority to sanction a particular form of marriage, then “fairness” would seem to be in favor of not excluding homosexuals from the institution of marriage. It is not until someone has the recognition of authority that our statements about traditional marriage make any sense.

They cannot hear us because they are spiritually deaf.

Toward a proper response

Jesus left us with two Great Commands and one mission. The commands are to love God and love our neighbor (Matthew 22:37-40). The mission is to make disciples (Matthew 28:18-20). The Great Commands and our mission should determine how we go about interacting with our culture.

There will be discussion and perhaps even argument, but in that discussion we need to keep in mind that we are called to a higher standard. We should reason with Christianity’s critics with the fruit of the Spirit in action. As a reminder, here is the list from Galatians 5:22-23:

love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control

Paul tells us that against these traits there is no law. In other words, reasonable people will not take offense if we operate with these traits in action.

When we speak the truth in love (Ephesians 4:15) then we put ourselves in the position to be used by God to transform lives.

We must remember that God does the transformation and he does it at the level of the individual.

What do you think? When is the Church justified in taking social action such as a boycott or protest?

Join our list

Get new posts in your inbox

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.

About Mark McIntyre

A follower of Jesus Christ who shares observations about how Scripture should impact the church and the world. Mark is the original author and editor of Attempts at Honesty.

Leave a Reply

10 Comments on "Toward a response to the moral chaos that surrounds us"

Notify of
avatar

Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Mike Gantt
Guest
2 years 7 months ago
You are correct that we who love Christ are to focus on Him that we might be individually transformed. However, that personal transformation will result, in other things, a transformation of our rhetoric and political choices. As citizens of a democracy, we have a responsibility to speak up for, and vote for, those people and ideas we think best for the country. To abstain from the responsibilities of citizen would be to dishonor authority, which the New Testament tells us to honor. Thus, we do not have to make a choice between personal transformation and redemption of the culture; we… Read more »
James M.
Guest
James M.
4 years 25 days ago
New here. Stumbled on by way of Kevin DeYoung’s blog. I sense the same kind of tension regarding culture building, and believe that disciple-making is the essence of what the church does. However, I don’t think this is an either-or choice. Disciple-making produces people who, with God-given minds and gifts will choose paths that blaze trails in particular directions; or, shall we say, impact culture. IE, changing the culture happens when Christians intentionally produce the stuff of culture. So, “behaving differently” is OK as far as it goes, but what does that look like in practice? Reagan, in noting your… Read more »
Reagan
Guest
Reagan
4 years 25 days ago
Thanks for the reply, James. I don’t believe I’m being unfair to Colson and Schaeffer. There work and that of groups like the Moral Majority seem to be the stream from which our concept of Christian cultural concern flows from. You’re right I should go back to the fountainhead himself. I hear Kuyper cited often, but haven’t read him. That will be my next stop. Here’s my dilema. I just don’t understand what the end game of civic action and political involvement is for the Christian. I’d be interested to hear some answers to this question: What are we as… Read more »
Reagan
Guest
Reagan
4 years 25 days ago
Right on, Mark! I think American Evangelicalism swallowed whole the ideas of Schaeffer and Colson (both brilliant men, mind you) without properly investigating the Biblical grounds for the so-called cultural mandate, Christian’s social responsibility, etc. In my mind, the New Testament case for this type of cultural transformation is so non-existant that at the very least all Christians should agree that any attempt to change the world aside from gospel proclamation, while not necessarily sinful, should be the absolute lowest priority for us. What’s even the goal? A society where everyone lives by Christian virtues? I agree that that would… Read more »
Kevin
Guest
Kevin
4 years 29 days ago

I some how gave you negative 15 stars, sorry. I just kept hitting the button and it kept going down? I only thought it deserved neg 10 :)

Kevin
Guest
Kevin
4 years 29 days ago

I think you are right on the mark here, (no pun intended). When you read the New Testament Jesus is usually condemning the religious leaders not the sinners. Rather, he was known as the friend of sinners. I do believe we need to be very careful when we take a “Moral stand” because we too often forget where we came from. It is Jesus who needs to reveal sin in the sinners heart not me.

wpDiscuz