The very nature of parenting demands that parents strive to prepare their children for life on their own. The same is true of leaders in general and spiritual leaders in particular.

Spiritual leaders are called to train those they lead in developing skills to read and understand the Bible, developing good spiritual habits, and having sufficient Biblical knowledge to be forewarned and forearmed against heretical teaching. In other words, the leader is to attempt to lessen the dependence upon the leader, just like a good parent wants his child to be capable of independent living.

Also, as a church leader, not only should the members be developed, but the elders in the congregation should also be trained so that when it comes time for the pastor to depart, the church remains healthy and stays the established course.

Unfortunately, I have seen too many times when Church leaders have not done this. I have seen too many shepherds that have not taught their sheep how to identify and be wary of the wolves in the midst. I have seen pastors who have not nurtured the elders that God provided to help care for the congregation.

I’ve been thinking about these issues recently which is why this passage from 1 Corinthians 3 struck a cord within me:

“According to God’s grace that was given to me, I have laid a foundation as a skilled master builder, and another builds on it. But each one is to be careful how he builds on it. For no one can lay any foundation other than what has been laid down. That foundation is Jesus Christ. If anyone builds on the foundation with gold, silver, costly stones, wood, hay, or straw, each one’s work will become obvious. For the day will disclose it, because it will be revealed by fire; the fire will test the quality of each one’s work. If anyone’s work that he has built survives, he will receive a reward. If anyone’s work is burned up, he will experience loss . . .”

1 Co 3:10–15 (CSB)

How many congregations have gone into a tailspin after their senior pastor leaves? How many times have we seen the large mega-church shrink in attendance after the well-known, popular preacher moves on for one reason or another?

To me, if a church goes into a tail spin after a pastor leaves, in most cases, this speaks volumes about the work that pastor had done there.

As Paul indicates above, the quality of each person’s work “will become obvious” when the day of testing comes.

If the church soldiers on and the people remain strong as the replacement is sought, then it is probably a good indication that the pastor was indeed building with “gold, silver, and costly stones.”

On the other hand, when the church falters when the pastor leaves, it is likely that he built with “wood, hay, and stubble.”

What is the difference between the two?

To me, the difference lies in a fundamental desire to teach and live out the Gospel of Jesus Christ without adding to it or subtracting from it. You might think this an oversimplification, but hear me out.

The Gospel does not need any sense of cultural “wokeness.” The Gospel, by its very nature, speaks to the core issue of every man and every woman. That core issue is our broken relationship with God and what Jesus accomplished on our behalf to heal the breach. We don’t need to add any of the cultural hot issues of the day to make the gospel relevant. The Gospel is ultimately relevant on its own with no enhancement necessary.

Neither does the Gospel need to be trimmed to fit the liking of the current culture. The Gospel is brutally honest about our condition apart from Christ. Words like lost and separated, condemned and broken, while uncomfortable, are maybe the very words we need to hear to get to the real core of our issues.

I have known several pastors that were great examples of teaching and living out the gospel. Two, in particular, come to mind. When those men retired, both of their churches stayed the course and continued the good work that was already established. They left a legacy of strong believers who provided care for the congregation.

On the other hand, I have personally witnessed the destruction which resulted from pastors pushing their own agenda that added to or subtracted from the Gospel. In this category, two also come to mind. In both cases, each pastor grew irritable and his interaction with elders and members became less and less an example of the positive impact of the Gospel. In both cases, many of God’s children were abused and disillusioned as a result of how they were treated by the pastor.

So pastors, I challenge you to teach and live out the gospel. Like a good spiritual parent, you are to demonstrate what a deepening relationship with Jesus looks like. Your life should make people hunger and thirst for a relationship with Christ and your teaching should show them the way to step into that relationship.

On top of this, you should be preparing those you lead to continue on the path after your departure.

Don’t let your life’s work be burned up when the day of trial comes.

Yesterday’s post was a prayer from the Psalms asking God for revival or renewal. That prayer begs the question, “what does that look like?”

The very next Psalm provides at least part of the answer. The Psalmist writes:

“Give me an undivided mind to fear your name.”

Psalm 86:11, CSB

A knowledge of the Gospel of Jesus Christ affords us the safety to admit that we do not have undivided minds. Our minds are very divided as the Apostle Paul laments in the bulk of Romans 7.

But Paul also does not leave us wallowing in our problems. He provides the glorious response in Romans 8:1 which tells us that there is no condemnation for those in Christ.

So, we can admit that everything we do is from mixed motivation. We cannot, in this life, fully and completely fulfill the first great command to love God with our entire being. Our attempts to do so are feeble at best.

But, we still pray the prayer asking for an undivided mind because that is what we want. We want to be an undivided whole, not being pulled in different directions. We want to be free of the internal conflict that causes so much anxiety.

While we cannot have a completely undivided mind, the prayer is still valid for two reasons.

First, we can see progress in our walk with Christ. As we grow in our relationship with Him, we find that the things that tripped us up in the past have less influence now. We can see progress in the healing of our divided selves.

This first outcome is hinted at in the verse quoted above. An undivided mind allows for a proper respect for God and his Word. The Westminster Shorter Catechism tells us that Scripture is provide to us to teach us, “what man is to believe concerning God, and what duty God requires of man. (WSC, Q. 3)” As the division in our minds is healed, there is an increasing desire to fulfill the duty to which we are called.

Secondly, we pray for this because it is the predicted (and guaranteed) outcome of our relationship with Christ. When we are finally and fully United with Christ, the division will be healed and the conflict will have ended.

When you go to most ice cream shops, you can ask for a taste of the flavor that you are considering. They give you a small spoon and you get a sense of what the full cup will be like.

I think this prayer is a little bit like that. We get a taste of what it will be like to be completely undivided in our thinking.

This morning I read the opening verses of 1 Corinthians 2 where Paul makes this statement:

And I, when I came to you, brothers, did not come proclaiming to you the testimony of God with lofty speech or wisdom. For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ and him crucified. And I was with you in weakness and in fear and much trembling, and my speech and my message were not in plausible words of wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power, so that your faith might not rest in the wisdom of men but in the power of God.

1 Co 2:1–5, ESV

I had to laugh when I read this. How many listings for teaching pastors list weakness, fear, and trembling as qualifications for the position?

We want dynamic speakers that use pop culture references and have that cool factor which will draw big crowds. We want the guy who tells heart warming stories that make us feel good. We want the preacher that can tell jokes with a style that would make a comedian jealous.

But the Apostle Paul, who wrote much of our New Testament, was none of these things.

I laughed as I imagined the rejection letter sent by the search committee:

Dear Paul, while the sermon samples you sent us are doctrinally sound, and you have some good points of application, the manner of delivery that you exhibited does not meet with our current worship culture. We wish you all the best but we have decided that you are not a good fit for our congregation at this time.

Perhaps we need a little bit more of weakness, fear, and trembling in our pastors. Then perhaps they would, like Paul, preach “Jesus Christ and him crucified” and not get caught up in the latest church growth fad.

There is nothing wrong with a lack of self-confidence as long as it is coupled with great confidence in a Risen Savior.