• Home
  • About This Blog
  • Contact Me
  • Subscribe
  • Comment Policy

Attempts at Honesty

Reflections on the interplay of the Bible and Culture

  • Westminster Shorter Catechism Series
  • Sermon on the Mount Series
Home Archives for Missional

Apathy and Ignorance in the Church

Posted on March 25, 2011 Written by Mark McIntyre Leave a Comment

Tony Campolo is famous (infamous?) for the following statement:

“I have three things I’d like to say today. First, while you were sleeping last night, 30,000 kids died of starvation or diseases related to malnutrition. Second, most of you don’t give a sh–. What’s worse is that you’re more upset with the fact that I said sh–than the fact that 30,000 kids died last night.” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Campolo)

Whether you agree with his method or not, Tony makes a point. Mr. Campolo highlights one of the barriers to those needs getting met; that barrier is apathy.

There are many physical needs in the world and with the apparent increasing frequency of disasters, these needs are increasing. There are seemingly infinite opportunities to find and meet the needs of people.

While I acknowledge that apathy is a problem, it is not the only problem. There are many who are not apathetic but struggle to know what to do about it. They can give some money to a relief agency or take time to volunteer, but even those efforts seem small in light of the overwhelming need. It is not hard to see why there is sometimes a willful ignorance of what is going on. The fight or flight response seems biased toward the latter.

In the same way, I have heard pleas from missions organizations that are intended to shake off the apathy of those listening and get them to support the effort to bring people to Christ. As with the meeting of physical needs, apathy is one of the factors inhibiting the meeting of spiritual needs. Ignorance also plays a role, perhaps even a larger role. In the case of believers, it is seldom willful ignorance, but a sense of not knowing what to do about it.

In order to do something effectively, I need to know what to do, how to do it and why it needs to be done. As believers, we know why people need Jesus, but we may struggle to know what to do about it and how to do it. In addition to the motivational speech, there also needs to be training as to what each person can do to bring a solution to the problem.

In the case of missions, it is very appropriate to donate money to missions organizations. Suggestions to forgo a latte or a meal out and donate those funds to missions are appropriate. We can learn to live on less and share some of what we have. But there needs to be something more for the church to be all it is intended to be.

What about the spiritual needs closer to home? What about that uncle or cousin who doesn’t know Jesus? What about the cranky neighbor who is intentionally disagreeable? What about the vocal atheist at work who ridicules anyone of faith? What do we do with these? How do we share our faith? Can I respond with confidence and grace when that atheist brings up difficult issues?

As our society becomes increasingly hostile toward the Judeo/Christian world view, and especially hostile to genuine faith in Christ, the need for training on how to deal with these questions will increase.

Thankfully, there are many in the church at large that see the problem and are taking steps to develop materials and methods to train people to defend what they believe and to follow Peter’s advice to “be prepared to make a defense to anyone who asks you for a reason for the hope that is in you; yet do it with gentleness and respect.”

The point of this post is to encourage church leaders to:

  1. Train people in foundational Christian doctrine and how to share their faith
  2. Determine what God is calling your local fellowship to do with regard to missions near and far
  3. Articulate a strategy for accomplishing what God has laid on your heart
  4. Give the people in your fellowship a sense of what they can do individually to accomplish the mission

Motivational speeches alone will not get the mission done. We need drill instructors to produce recruits ready for battle.

Technorati Tags: Missional,apathy,missions,training,evangelization

Filed Under: Christianity and Culture Tagged With: Missional

What I Learn from the Missional Movement

Posted on April 17, 2010 Written by Mark McIntyre 2 Comments

I recently overheard half of a phone conversation regarding the “missional” movement and the “Emergent Church” which prompted some thoughts.

My thoughts gravitated to the two great commands. The first is to love God with my entire being. The second is to love my neighbor as myself.

We, as humans, seem to prefer extremes – finding life in the gray to be uncomfortable. Those in the orthodox camp seem to gravitate to the first command and strive for doctrinal purity as an act of worship toward God. Those in the “liberal” or “emergent” camp (I am increasingly uncomfortable with these types of labels since they can become more judgmental than informational) seem to gravitate toward the second and seek “social” justice and reconciliation between men.

The orthodox are often content to meet in their enclaves on Sunday waiting for the bold soul who will darken their door and ask them what they believe. The emergent people eschew formal meetings and seek to spend time “in community” reaching out to those who are not part of the church.

The pitfall for the orthodox is that we can be so focused on doctrinal purity and proper understanding that we fail to live out the second command and love our neighbors who are lost and going to Hell.

The pitfall for the emergent church is that they can be so focused on those who are living outside the church community that they can compromise the message of the gospel in order to draw people into the community. The danger lies in the ecumenical or “big tent” mentality which tends to gravitate toward the lowest common denominator. The lowest denominator ends up being the moral law which all can accept. This mentality can cause them to stay away from divisive ideas like “Jesus is the only way to God.”

I clearly fall within the orthodox camp and take a strong stand on critical issues such as the deity of Jesus, virgin birth, inspiration and authority of Scripture, etc. The challenge to me from the missional movement is that I have a message that I rarely share with those outside the church. Those in the missional movement put me to shame with regard to their efforts to reach out to a lost community. They put me to shame with regard to their efforts to live out the second greatest command.

But, I am reminded that the second command cannot be lived out without the first being first. In other words, to live out the second command, without prior living of the first, is doomed to failure from and eternal perspective. It does only temporary (temporal?) good to feed and clothe and commune with lost people and allow them to remain in their sin. To minister to physical needs without addressing the core issue of sin only provides temporary relief and could perhaps do greater harm.

The analogy I would use is giving pain killer to an athlete to get him back in the competition, the end result being that the lack of pain allows him to do further damage to the injured member. A line I heard recently is “God loves us just the way we are but loves us too much to allow us to remain that way.” To make it OK to remain in sin does no-one any good.

Filed Under: Emergent Church Tagged With: Missional

Follow Attempts at Honesty

Honesty in your Inbox

Post Series

  • Westminster Shorter Catechism Series
  • Sermon on the Mount Series
August 2025
SMTWTFS
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31 
« Jul    

Categories

Archives

Blogger Grid
Follow me on Blogarama

Copyright © 2025 · Focus Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in