• Home
  • About This Blog
  • Contact Me
  • Subscribe
  • Comment Policy

Attempts at Honesty

Reflections on the interplay of the Bible and Culture

  • Westminster Shorter Catechism Series
  • Sermon on the Mount Series
Home Archives for 2021

Archives for 2021

New is always better?

Posted on April 7, 2021 Written by Mark McIntyre Leave a Comment

One thing that I have noticed in those who are pushing for what they call progress, is that they are usually tolerant of anything new and intolerant of anyone who questions their new idea. For the sake of this discussion I will call them progressives.

I have encountered progressives in the political realm and I have also seen them in the church. In this post, I will concentrate on what I’ve observed in the church.

The proverb, “before removing a fence, a wise man asks why it was put there in the first place” applies here. New is not automatically better, but neither is old automatically better. Fortunately, for the church, we have the revealed word of God in Scripture to use as our guide in evaluating ideas, both new and old. As Protestants, we do not elevate church tradition to the level of authority that those in the Roman Catholic Church do, but we should consider the basis on which the tradition was established before throwing it away.

The second problem with progressives in the church is that “progress” often implies that subtle changes to the Gospel are required. For example, preachers who focus on social justice can imply that those that do not conform to the leader’s understanding of current social justice ideas are deficient in their understanding and application of the Gospel. I have personally sat under such preaching and it is annoying at best and heretical at worst.

I am concerned that in our efforts to conform to current notions of social justice, the church is damaging its witness by adapting its message to ideology that is not, at its core, Biblical.

I have heard this new way of looking at racial issues called critical race theory (CRT). I have not studied this enough to have a complete understanding of what this means, but it does seem to have infiltrated much of the church. I observe that CRT actually promotes rather than heals division between groups. If I am wrong in this understanding, feel free to offer correction in the comment section below.

Telling one group that they are inherently racist because of the color of their skin seems inherently racist to me. How ironic it is that those who are ostensibly fighting racism use methods that actually promote it by reversing the direction of its application. Are we trying to bring unity and restoration or are we merely trying to reverse the power structures?

When a church stops teaching that we are all in need of transformation and begins to teach that some need more transformation than others, that church has ceased preaching the true Gospel of Jesus Christ.

I understand that as a whole, the church has badly fallen short in obeying the second great command to love our neighbor as ourselves. The fact that Jesus called this a great command is an indication that we cannot possibly overemphasize this. Our application of this command should indeed transcend our differences as we seek to treat everyone with respect. It would not cause me heartburn if every sermon included an encouragement to obey this great command along with specific examples of how we can improve in obeying it. It is that important.

My problem with progressives and social justice warriors is that they are more often than not selective in how this is to be applied. Yes, we should be concerned that everyone gets treated fairly regardless of the color of their skin. But what about concern for the unborn who are killed by the thousands every day? What are we doing to solve the issues that cause homelessness? Are we going to stand up to the NEA to demand that alternative educational schemes be explored? Are we willing to examine all the ways that we fall short in how we love our neighbors or are we simply jumping on the current cultural bandwagon as a means of appearing hip and drawing people into the church?

The whole point of the reformation was to correct the “progress” that the church had made through the centuries. The progressives turned the church into something other than what Christ intended it to be.

Let’s not go down that path again.

Filed Under: Commentary

Easter Greetings 2021

Posted on April 4, 2021 Written by Mark McIntyre Leave a Comment

It has been nearly two whole months since I’ve posted. I hope that this note finds you well and I also hope that you have been encouraged by your celebration of the resurrection of Jesus Christ.

The short reason I haven’t written in a while is that I felt like I had nothing to say that would be helpful to anyone. I mostly write about the church and church leadership issues and I have gone through a period where I was very frustrated and not very positive in my outlook.

I have watched a man take control of what was a good church and turn it into a place where people get hurt and walk away wondering what happened to them. This pastor made a unilateral hiring decision that increased the rate of decline by bringing another pastor on staff who shared his progressive views and had the skills to politically maneuver around the elders who questioned the new direction.

I have watched as the elders who questioned the direction were demonized by the pastors to the point where their only recourse was to resign and walk away. In the past two years, seven elders have been pushed out the door. They hung in there as long as they could to protect the people assigned to their care, but eventually got to the point where they were no longer effective due to lies spread about them.

These are men that I would love to stand with shoulder-to-shoulder, encouraging people in the faith. Every one of them remains qualified for church leadership per the standards set by the Apostle Paul in 1 Timothy and Titus. They are godly men yet they were badly treated by the pastors.

These events have been so frustrating, I began wondering what role, if any, I would have in any church moving forward. At work, I expect leaders to be self-promoting, but this behavior should never be part of church life.

But then, Scripture reminds me that God remains in control and the knuckleheads that sometimes rise to the top in churches do not escape God’s notice. God has pronounced some very sobering statements about what happens to those who abuse His people (Jeremiah 23 comes to mind). I am reminded that I can leave this in God’s hands, he will handle it.

The Psalms are full of questions about why evil men seem to prosper while asking God how long he will wait before he acts. It seems that frustration with the status quo has been a nearly universal experience with the saints throughout the ages. Therefore I am encouraged that I am not alone and my prayers do not fall on deaf ears since God saw fit to include similar complaints in the Psalter.

And, I am reminded that God is patient with sinners and his delay is an opportunity for those in rebellion to repent. For God’s patience I am thankful since I am also one in need of grace and forgiveness.

But most of all, I am reminded this Easter that evil will not triumph despite how it looks in the moment. The one weapon of mass destruction our enemy can wield is death. Jesus’ resurrection proves that this weapon has been disarmed. By rising from the dead, Jesus proved he has the power to make things right and his promise to do so will be made good.

Jesus also promised to build his church. I am encouraged that Jesus is powerful enough to accomplish his purpose for the church even when leaders are perverting the gospel by adjusting it to conform it to current cultural norms.

Happy Easter! Jesus is alive and He will build His church. I’m beginning to regain excitement to see what it will look like.

Filed Under: Commentary

How do we choose our heroes?

Posted on February 7, 2021 Written by Mark McIntyre Leave a Comment

According to Merriam-Webster, a hero is “a person admired for achievements and noble qualities” or “one who shows great courage.”

During the COVID-19 crisis, those on the front lines of fighting this disease have been rightly identified as heroes based on the definition cited above.

This came to mind when I began reading the first chapter of Matthew where I encountered the story of Joseph, the wife of Mary, the mother of Jesus.

Joseph is perhaps the best example in Scripture of someone who quietly did the right thing. While he doesn’t get a lot of ink in the Bible, his role in God’s story of salvation is significant, if not flashy. He is a hero according to Merriam-Webster’s definition.

What did he do that is so noteworthy?

Joseph was willing to marry Mary while knowing that scandal and questions would follow him for the rest of his life.

I’m pretty sure that 2,000 years ago, people were aware of the gestation period of a human child. They could count months and in a small town, everyone would be aware of what was happening with this young couple.

Questions about the timing of the birth of Jesus would have provided all the gossips in the town ample source material for speculation. They would have continued to talk behind the backs of Joseph and Mary long after the birth had taken place. Then, like now, they understood what causes pregnancy and would have questions regarding Mary’s and perhaps Joseph’s integrity.

Joseph obeyed God while knowing that his obedience was signing him up for a good bit of difficulty and disgrace in the eyes of the community. He did the right thing even though no-one in that town may have understood that it was the right thing.

In the history of the church, there have been thousands, if not millions, of men and women who have followed Joseph’s example of quietly doing the right thing. They have been obedient to their God despite the opinion of anyone in the community around them.

Rather than desiring to do big things for God, perhaps we should just focus on being obedient in the small things and let God worry about the rest. We can be encouraged in this obedience by the example of Joseph.

Joseph is a hero. He had the courage to do the right thing even when there was a personal cost in doing so.

Filed Under: Bible Reflection

Fulfill what you vow

Posted on February 5, 2021 Written by Mark McIntyre Leave a Comment

When you make a vow to God, don’t delay fulfilling it, because he does not delight in fools. Fulfill what you vow. Better that you do not vow than that you vow and not fulfill it. Do not let your mouth bring guilt on you, and do not say in the presence of the messenger that it was a mistake. Why should God be angry with your words and destroy the work of your hands?

Ecclesiastes 5:4-6 (CSB)

God takes vows seriously and there are consequences for vow breaking.

This Scripture passage is good to remember because our culture wants to tell us that it is OK to walk away from something that was vowed. In our society, we are no longer astonished by how often marriage vows are broken, even among church leaders. We have too much evidence that a pattern of seeing vows as non-binding has crept into the church.

In the denomination to which I currently belong, all ordained leaders, whether ruling elders (lay leaders) or teaching elders (pastors), take a vow to act in accordance with the constitution of the church.

But there are some in the church who feel that they are not bound by that constitution and can ignore the parts that they don’t like or don’t want to follow. They feel free to assume that the rules were written for a different kind of church or don’t apply to them for some other reason.

And, to my amazement, they ignore those vows seemingly without remorse or pangs of conscience. They cite “reasons” as to why they have the freedom to operate outside the boundaries they vowed to uphold. They claim to be justified in their behavior.

I have one church in mind as I write this.

Large numbers of people have left that church, including over one-third of the elder board because of their inability to bring correction to the problem. It is likely that the general membership does not know that the remaining leaders have such a cavalier attitude toward the standards they claim to uphold. Yet, many members have expressed a sense that “something is not quite right.”

The leaders that remain are trying to hold it together, but how can such a weak foundation support the structure they are trying to build upon it? How can we expect God to bless and grow a ministry that does not hold to its vows? One cannot build something healthy on a foundation of deception.

It seems to me that there are two legitimate options for that church. One option is that the leaders can admit that they do not intend to follow the constitution and bring it to a vote of the membership to withdraw from the denomination. There is no dishonor in acknowledging that they have had a change of heart in these matters.

The second option is to repent and begin to fulfill what they have vowed no matter the difficulty entailed in doing so. This would involve active participation in, and submission to, the local presbytery.

To pay lip service to denominational standards while not complying with them is not a legitimate option, but I fear is the path that will be chosen because it is the path they have been on. Nothing that has been said by the leaders indicates of a change in heart.

I hope I am wrong.

If you would like to comment (pro or con), please use the comment form below to offer your feedback. I enjoy hearing from you.

Filed Under: Bible Reflection

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • Next Page »

Follow Attempts at Honesty

Honesty in your Inbox

Post Series

  • Westminster Shorter Catechism Series
  • Sermon on the Mount Series
September 2025
SMTWTFS
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930 
« Aug    

Categories

Archives

Blogger Grid
Follow me on Blogarama

Copyright © 2025 · Focus Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in