• Home
  • About This Blog
  • Contact Me
  • Subscribe
  • Comment Policy

Attempts at Honesty

Reflections on the interplay of the Bible and Culture

  • Westminster Shorter Catechism Series
  • Sermon on the Mount Series
Home Atheism A follow-up to some comments

A follow-up to some comments

Posted on July 9, 2013 Written by Mark McIntyre 13 Comments


U Turn PermittedIn February of last year (2012), I published a post entitled “The temptation of anger in response to militant atheism.” That post received a number of comments from those who challenged some of my assertions. The commentors also asked some very good questions. In this post, I attempt to answer some of the challenges and questions.

Let me begin by thanking the commentors for the civility in their responses. While I think that my opinions are reasonable (or else why bother to post them?), I have no delusions that I have all the truth or that my thinking is not, nor ever could ever be tainted by illogic. I appreciate both the dialog and the respectful tone throughout the comments.

In considering my previous post, I regret the use of the term “militant” to describe the actions of Jessica Ahlquist and others who would identify themselves as atheists. As the commentors pointed out, the term carries connotations that are not helpful in the midst of civil discourse. For this I ask forgiveness of my readers. I want the focus of my writing to be on ideas without being incendiary or antagonistic.

My struggle is in finding a suitable term to convey my thoughts. Other terms like aggressive, evangelistic or offensive also carry negative connotations. My choice of the word militant was intended to describe an atheism is that is seeking to change the mind or behavior of others. It is not passive atheism, therefore I propose to use the term “active” in lieu of the word “militant” in any future dialog on this subject.

A second point of clarification. The focus of the post was to challenge Christians to rethink their response to Jessica. I am often embarrassed by the hateful responses of Christians to those with whom they disagree. When Christians respond in anger, they cease to be like the one by whose name they identify themselves. In fact, the only group to which Jesus ever expressed any anger was the religious leaders of his day.

When I wrote the post, it did not cross my mind that those who sympathize with Jessica’s actions would be reading and commenting. I am thankful that they did read it and took the time to comment.

I agree that the status quo has no value in and of itself. The current situation may be good or bad and there is nothing inherently wrong with a challenge to the status quo. Truth should always triumph over error.

That being said, it saddens me to see that we, as a country, are leaving the philosophical underpinnings that provide the very freedom on which Jessica’s challenge is based. Even a casual observer can see that the only places in the world where democracy and freedom are experienced are countries that once had a Christian heritage.

Yes, I am aware that when the church has gotten political power, it has gone badly for both the church and the world around her. I am not in favor of any form of theocracy. I am glad that I live in a country where someone like Jessica can challenge something that she finds offensive, even if I do not understand how the prayer could be construed as being so.

 


Filed Under: Atheism Tagged With: atheism, atheist, comment, dialog

About Mark McIntyre

A follower of Jesus Christ who shares observations about how Scripture should impact the church and the world. Mark is the original author and editor of Attempts at Honesty.

I have the opportunity to go to Istanbul, Turkey this summer to minister to Syrian refugees. If you would like more details about this trip, please use this link Mark McIntyre - Istanbul, Turkey Please note that this trip is fully funded, but I would appreciate your continued prayer. The trip will take place June 27 - July 6, 2025.

Follow Attempts at Honesty

Honesty in your Inbox

Question 15

By what sin?

Question 15 of the Westminster Shorter Catechism asks, “By what sin did our first parents fall from their original condition?”

C. S. Lewis on responding to pain

A quote from C. S. Lewis on what is effective in helping someone respond to the pain of a difficult time provides a challenge to all believers.

Speed Limit 55 sign

Worshipping a God without limits

While we can often only see the limits, we are called to see beyond them. Why? Because we worship and serve a limitless God.

Question 14

What is sin?

It seems to me that even those who would not acknowledge the idea of sin still have feelings that they should be better than they are. Almost any sentence that begins with the words, “I ought . . .” would give evidence in support of this assertion.

Resurrection People

Resurrection People

The way Christians live should give evidence of the truth of Easter. The way Christians live should also give people a foretaste of what life will be like when Jesus comes back to make everything right.

Post Series

  • Westminster Shorter Catechism Series
  • Sermon on the Mount Series
June 2025
SMTWTFS
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930 
« May    

Categories

Archives

Blogger Grid
Follow me on Blogarama

Copyright © 2025 · Focus Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in