• Home
  • About This Blog
  • Contact Me
  • Subscribe
  • Comment Policy

Attempts at Honesty

Reflections on the interplay of the Bible and Culture

  • Westminster Shorter Catechism Series
  • Sermon on the Mount Series
Home 2017 Archives for February 2017

Archives for February 2017

What is sinful about man’s fallen condition?

Posted on February 27, 2017 Written by Mark McIntyre Leave a Comment

Question 18Question 18 asks, “What is sinful about man’s fallen condition?”

I actually prefer the original answer to this one which is, “The sinfulness of that estate whereinto man fell, consists in the guilt of Adam’ s first sin, the want of original righteousness, and the corruption of his whole nature, which is commonly called Original Sin; together with all actual transgressions which proceed from it.”

Malcolm Muggeridge has written, “The depravity of man is at once the most empirically verifiable reality but at the same time the most intellectually resisted fact.” One does not have to work very hard to find evidence that something is very broken in the world. If we are honest with ourselves, we have to admit that there is something very broken inside of us.

The Christian explanation is that what is wrong with the world is that men (and women) start out broken because we have inherited a sin nature from our first parents. In other words, we are born in a state of rebellion against God and it is only an act of God’s grace that can overcome this state.

Yes, I realize that this is not a popular idea. We would all like to believe that men are basically good and that given the right conditions, they will do the right thing and life will be lovely. But history does not bear this out. I just heard on the news yesterday that in the City of Philadelphia, deaths from opioid overdose have quadrupled in the last few years. While our culture is moving further toward personal freedom, it seems that this freedom is not bringing the intended result. Despair seems to be on the increase.

This answer does not teach us that all men are as bad as they could be. There are many people who are loving, kind upstanding citizens who don’t believe in God or identify themselves as Christians. The idea of the depravity of man does not deny that men retain some desire to pursue good ends.

Nor does it teach us that those who come to believe in Jesus Christ will no longer struggle with a sin nature. The Apostle Paul has a lot to say about this in Romans 7.

What this idea does teach us is that we are in need of a Savior to do for us what we cannot do for ourselves. A proper understanding of original sin reveals that while we do things that look good on the outside, we do them for all the wrong reasons. If the proper goal of life is to glorify God and enjoy him forever, then everything must be done with that motivation. The problem is that we can do good things for selfish reasons.

I am constantly reminded that Christianity is not a moral code of behavior. It is not a set of rules to be obeyed. Christianity at its center is trusting in Jesus Christ to do for us what we could not do for ourselves. It is trusting that Christ’s righteous life is accepted by God on our behalf (See 2 Cor. 5:21).

Filed Under: Discipleship

What I’ve been doing instead of blogging

Posted on February 25, 2017 Written by Mark McIntyre 1 Comment

PCA LogoThose who regularly read this blog have probably realized that over the last year, posts have been rather sporadic. I took a long break between Memorial Day and Labor Day and haven’t posted very regularly since coming back to it in September.

I thought I would take a few minutes to tell you what has been consuming my time.

A couple of years ago, I became convinced that I should pursue licensure to preach in the Presbyterian Church of America (PCA), the domination to which I currently belong. The reasons for pursuing this were two. First, it was an opportunity to sharpen both my knowledge of the Bible and my theological understanding. And secondly, it would qualify me to be “on the bench” for the PCA churches in our area, some of which are small church plants that do not have multiple elders who are qualified to fill the pulpit.

The PCA has adopted the Westminster Confession of Faith along with the two Westminster Catechisms as the definitive statements of their belief. These were documents to which I had no exposure prior to moving forward toward licensure. And, while I have a graduate degree in Biblical Studies, that degree was obtained more than 25 years ago, so I was more than a little rusty in my knowledge and it took a lot of time and effort to gain the required familiarity with these documents to pass the licensure examinations. This preparation consumed the time that I would otherwise have invested in posting to this blog.

I am happy to say that last Saturday, February 18, the final step in the process was completed. I am now officially licensed by the Eastern Pennsylvania Presbytery to preach in the churches of the PCA. I am relieved that the process is over and am excited to see what opportunities present themselves to preach. I am also happy to be able to spend some time writing for Attempts at Honesty.

Before starting this process, I would have told you that I am really bad at memorization. I envy those who can read something a couple of times and regurgitate it word for word with little effort. My brain is not like that. But, I did find out that even though it requires a lot of effort on my part, I can indeed memorize and have memorized about half of the Westminster Shorter Catechism.

If you are convinced that you cannot memorize Bible verses or anything else, I encourage you to not give up. The effort will be rewarded by the quick recall of what you have memorized.

Filed Under: Commentary Tagged With: licensure, PCA, preach

On eloquence (or lack thereof) in prayer

Posted on February 20, 2017 Written by Mark McIntyre Leave a Comment

EloquenceI must confess that I am sometimes intimidated about praying in a church gathering such as a prayer meeting or small group. My brain is not wired to call up Old Testament images about restoring what the locusts have eaten or calling down mighty angels. These references make those adept at praying sound so . . . so . . . spiritual and powerful.

I am not poking fun at them, I really am impressed with some people’s ability to think of these things to spice up their prayer. Such eloquence is a gift, it just happens to be a gift that I do not possess.

But some encouragement came to me during a recent reading of Exodus 5.

That chapter records that Pharaoh increased the workload on the Israelites as a result of Moses’ request to let the people of Israel celebrate a feast to God. The Israelites, in turn, confronted Moses blaming him for the increased hardship.

Moses then brings this to God. Notice the language of his prayer:

“O Lord, why have you brought harm to this people? Whey did you ever send me? Ever since I came to Pharaoh to speak in your name, he has done harm to this people and you have not delivered your people at all.” – Exodus 5:22-23

That prayer contains no flowery language. It is short and honest. Moses asks the questions that are on his heart and tells God why he is asking. There is no hiding behind excess words here. Moses comes to God and directly tells him what is on his mind.

This encourages me that prayer does not need to be eloquent to be effective. It is OK to come directly to the point. It is OK to be honest and straight-forward.

I suppose the lesson is that there is no best way to pray. The important thing is to do it.

Filed Under: Bible Reflection

Follow Attempts at Honesty

Honesty in your Inbox

Post Series

  • Westminster Shorter Catechism Series
  • Sermon on the Mount Series
February 2017
SMTWTFS
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728 
« Jan   Mar »

Categories

Archives

Blogger Grid
Follow me on Blogarama

Copyright © 2025 · Focus Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in