• Home
  • About This Blog
  • Contact Me
  • Subscribe
  • Comment Policy

Attempts at Honesty

Reflections on the interplay of the Bible and Culture

  • Westminster Shorter Catechism Series
  • Sermon on the Mount Series
Home Apologetics Dealing with apparent failure in apologetics

Dealing with apparent failure in apologetics

Posted on November 9, 2013 Written by Mark McIntyre 5 Comments


The apparent failure

It is my guess that just about everyone who is interested in Christian apologetics is aware of 1 Peter 3:15 in which Peter encourages believers to be ready to make a defense (apology) to everyone who asks about our hope. Yet, when we make that defense, not everyone responds to the claims of the Gospel.

Admittedly, sometimes the lack of response is because of a poor presentation on our part. When this is the case, it should spur us on to further prayer, study and reflection so that we are better prepared the next time.

But, there are other times when the lack of response is not due to inadequate answers or a defective presentation. How then should we respond?

Don’t be surprised

Watering CanIn the first place, it should not be a surprise, nor should the lack of response be a source of inordinate frustration. I read this morning in John:

“Though he had done so many signs before them, they still did not believe in him,” (John 12:37, ESV)

The lesson that I learn from this verse is that in some cases, a rejection of the Gospel is not due to lack of evidence or understanding. I am reminded of the little ditty, “a man convinced against his will is of the same opinion still.”

If some could witness the miracles of Jesus and remain unconvinced and unconverted, we would be foolish to think that everyone will respond to our presentation and defense of the Gospel. The will overrides the intellect when dealing with matters of faith and world view. If the lack of response is an indication of failure, it is a failure that Jesus also experienced.

Leave the result in God’s hands

Secondly, we are not called to produce a result, we are called to provide the defense to the best of our ability. God is the only one who can change hearts and the only one who takes the responsibility for the result. As Paul reminded the Corinthians, it is God who produces the growth:

“I planted, Apollos watered, but God gave the growth.” (1 Corinthians 3:6, ESV)

We are complicated beings who operate within the overlap of the sovereignty of God and the free will of men. While God remains in control of the process, we each make choices along the way. Some of those choices move us away from God, yet God can use even those choices to bring us back to him.

As indicated above, even Paul acknowledged that the best he could do was plant seeds. If the man who wrote a large part of our New Testament could not guarantee the growth of the seeds, we would be foolish for us to expect to do better.

Make a defense, plant a seed wherever you can and let the result in God’s hands.


Filed Under: Apologetics Tagged With: apologetics, defense, failure, miracle

About Mark McIntyre

A follower of Jesus Christ who shares observations about how Scripture should impact the church and the world. Mark is the original author and editor of Attempts at Honesty.

Follow Attempts at Honesty

Honesty in your Inbox

Banquet

Absent From the Great Banquet

The Banquet Table is Set Luke 14:16-24 records the parable of the Great Banquet. The main point of the story is that the invited guests gave lame excuses as to why they could not attend. In the place of the original invitees, the dregs of society are then persuaded to enter into the feast. Jesus […]

Return

Rend your hearts and not your garments

My experience is that if you have been in the church for any length of time, it becomes easy to play a role and do “churchy” stuff and just go with the flow. We can put on our game face, come to church, sing three songs, give some offering, listen to a sermon and plan our lunch during the closing song.

Research

Hypothesis, research and faith

The difference between science and faith is not one of method. The difference is what data are allowed to be considered. You may disagree with the presuppositions, but Christian thinkers follow the same methods of investigation and analysis that scientists follow.

A Twitter Milestone

I’m relatively new to Twitter, but I did just passed a milestone. This morning I sent out my 1,000th Tweet: RT @artiedavis: Giving away 10-Copies! of @scottwilliams new book: Diversity here> http://ow.ly/4LYAI. Just RT this, and leave comment. — Mark McIntyre (@mhmcintyre) May 3, 2011 In the grand scheme of things, this is not a […]

Miles Stanford

Miles Stanford on self denial

Miles Stanford comments on those who seem spiritually mature but are really wrapped up in self.

Post Series

  • Westminster Shorter Catechism Series
  • Sermon on the Mount Series
January 2023
SMTWTFS
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031 
« Dec    

Categories

Archives

Blogger Grid
Follow me on Blogarama

Copyright © 2023 · Focus Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in