• Home
  • About This Blog
  • Contact Me
  • Subscribe
  • Comment Policy

Attempts at Honesty

Reflections on the interplay of the Bible and Culture

  • Westminster Shorter Catechism Series
  • Sermon on the Mount Series
Home Commentary On the peaceful transfer of power

On the peaceful transfer of power

Posted on January 21, 2017 Written by Mark McIntyre Leave a Comment


Peaceful
Copyright: icetray / 123RF Stock Photo

I have avoided partisan politics in this blog. I am actually registered as an independent and have no party affiliation. I do not care a bit about whether any of the politicians who represent me in government have an “R” or a “D” behind their names.

Also, I am not a news junkie and am usually uninformed about current events. I did not watch any of the coverage of the inauguration. Politics is not my thing. That being said, even I am aware that there were violent protests in response to the inauguration of Donald Trump as our 45th President.

Presidential inaugurations have been peaceful transitions of power where the presidential office transcends party politics and is honored by citizens regardless of their party affiliation. But yesterday there were violent protests against our newly minted president.

In 2009, there were many who felt that the election of Barack Obama was not good for the country. But I don’t remember many (any?) violent protests in response to his inauguration. There was plenty of complaining and pontificating in conservative circles about the Obama Presidency, but very little violence. In support of this, read this NY Times article.

What is different this time? What is it in our culture that seems to be pushing us toward anarchy?

Some will likely denounce this as too simplistic or as religious propaganda, but I think the drift toward anarchy is due to the popular opinion that there are no transcendent values or a universal moral law.

Without a moral law to which an aggrieved person can appeal, his only means of redressing his perceived wrong is brute force. Without a standard against which disagreements can be evaluated, the only alternative is to shout louder to win the argument.

As a Christian, when my government makes decisions with which I do not agree, I find comfort in the belief that nothing can derail God’s plan for humanity. You might think me delusional to believe this, but at least my delusion allows me to have peace in the midst of the conflict.

If God is indeed in control, we have a court of appeals where we can bring our frustrations. The Psalms are full of such complaint and appeals for God to act. We can leave it in God’s hands.

But if there is no God, then any means of winning is acceptable. Violent protest can then be construed as a virtue. If there is no higher law, violent protest is merely standing up for what one believes and no-one should criticize their methods.

Contrast this with the strategy of Dr. Martin Luther King. King pointed us to a higher law that revealed the shabbiness of our behavior to people of color. He showed us that those who resort to violence are on the wrong side of that higher law. He was right to do so, our country was broken and needed to be fixed. Our country is still broken, but as Dr. King showed us, violence will do nothing to mend it.

I wonder if those who subscribe to the meme that there is no transcendent moral code don’t feel a little bit uncomfortable with the slide toward anarchy that we are seeing in the political arena. I wonder if there is a small part of them that realizes the danger of allowing anyone to act upon the belief that he, himself, is his own standard.

That discomfort is a clue that there might indeed be a transcendent standard. It should also serve as a goad to find out what that standard is and who has the authority to set that standard. The consequences of not pursuing this question will be devastating on an individual and on a national level.


Filed Under: Commentary Tagged With: inauguration, morals, peaceful, power

About Mark McIntyre

A follower of Jesus Christ who shares observations about how Scripture should impact the church and the world. Mark is the original author and editor of Attempts at Honesty.

Follow Attempts at Honesty

Honesty in your Inbox

Abandoned by God – 1 Samuel 15:35

1 Samuel 15:35 (ESV) 35 And Samuel did not see Saul again until the day of his death, but Samuel grieved over Saul. And the Lord regretted that he had made Saul king over Israel. Saul had abandoned God and as a result, God abandons Saul. Someone once said that we have two options which […]

Success & Failure

Failure: The Unintended Consequence of Success

This is a guest post by Todd Pylant whose biographical information appears in the author box below this post. If you would like to provide a guest post to Attempts at Honesty, please see the guest post guidelines and contact me if you are interested in providing a post. The writer of Hebrews demonstrated faith […]

Candle

Putting Christ in Christmas? – Do we really need to fight that battle?

I fail to see the importance of some of the “Put Christ back in Christmas” rhetoric. How about we live changed lives instead?

On giving offense

Nowhere can you find Jesus indicating that ideas don’t matter and any belief is acceptable as long as it is firmly held. On every page of the gospel accounts, Jesus says something that is deemed intolerant by our society.

Under Construction

Under Construction: New Blog Theme for Attempts at Honesty

Attempts at Honesty is under construction as we customize the installation of our Pagelines theme. The colors, graphics and fonts will be changing over the next few weeks as I learn more about Pagelines.

Post Series

  • Westminster Shorter Catechism Series
  • Sermon on the Mount Series
February 2023
SMTWTFS
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728 
« Jan    

Categories

Archives

Blogger Grid
Follow me on Blogarama

Copyright © 2023 · Focus Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in