• Home
  • About This Blog
  • Contact Me
  • Subscribe
  • Comment Policy

Attempts at Honesty

Reflections on the interplay of the Bible and Culture

  • Westminster Shorter Catechism Series
  • Sermon on the Mount Series
Home Archives for Commentary

On the nature of the church

Posted on July 1, 2024 Written by Mark McIntyre 1 Comment

Human institutions must put their continuance as a very high if not the highest, priority. They must promote the organization’s welfare over the benefit of one of the members. Members who don’t contribute to the institution’s success are forced out for the good of the entire group.

Those of us who don’t get paid for ministry understand this. I continue to get paychecks because I contribute to the success of my employer. When I no longer contribute to that success, then my employment is likely to end quickly. Corporate America has little or no tolerance for freeloaders.

Unfortunately, I have seen churches that seek to emulate corporate America in their structure and organization. I was in one church that hired an Executive Pastor who was anything but pastoral in his approach to people and the ministry. He was all about policy, procedure, branding, and control and had little interest in caring for the people he was hired to nurture.

He tried to run the church as if it was a corporation. The measurements he sought to use to determine success were attendance and giving. The people were treated as a means to an end rather than the whole purpose of the church.

Thinking of the church this way is to make a category error. The church is not a strictly human institution. The church is God’s idea and according to Jesus, it is His responsibility to build it (see Matthew 16:18).

I have written about this before, but when the church is more about implementing programs and methods than it is about seeking the guidance of God, then there is a problem. When people are treated as a means to increased influence and power rather than the ones Jesus came to save, then there is a problem. When the leadership feels pressure to avoid saying anything from the pulpit that might offend someone, then there is a problem.

I’m not saying that we should be intentionally offensive or take divisive stands on things that are not central to the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

What I am saying is that like the diagnosis delivered by the doctor that will potentially lead to the healing of the patient, the Gospel must first deliver the news of why the hearer needs to be saved. Salvation doesn’t come to those who don’t acknowledge their need.

All this is to say that so many methods of the church growth movement seem misguided and pretentious to me. They seem to want to replace a relationship with Jesus with a membership in a social club.

Maybe this is an oversimplification, but when the focus is taken off of Jesus and put on the organization, I doubt that lasting benefit will result. Instead, I want a pastor and elders who consistently point me to Jesus so that I can follow Him.

“Therefore, since we have so great a cloud of witnesses surrounding us, let us also lay aside every encumbrance and the sin which so easily entangles us, and let us run with endurance the race that is set before us, fixing our eyes on Jesus, the author and perfecter of faith, who for the joy set before Him endured the cross, despising the shame, and has sat down at the right hand of the throne of God.”

Hebrews 12:1–2, NASB 95

I don’t need a bad imitation of a corporation, I need the body of Christ and fellow believers who will encourage me to stay in the race and not lose heart.

Filed Under: Church Leadership, Commentary

New is always better?

Posted on April 7, 2021 Written by Mark McIntyre Leave a Comment

One thing that I have noticed in those who are pushing for what they call progress, is that they are usually tolerant of anything new and intolerant of anyone who questions their new idea. For the sake of this discussion I will call them progressives.

I have encountered progressives in the political realm and I have also seen them in the church. In this post, I will concentrate on what I’ve observed in the church.

The proverb, “before removing a fence, a wise man asks why it was put there in the first place” applies here. New is not automatically better, but neither is old automatically better. Fortunately, for the church, we have the revealed word of God in Scripture to use as our guide in evaluating ideas, both new and old. As Protestants, we do not elevate church tradition to the level of authority that those in the Roman Catholic Church do, but we should consider the basis on which the tradition was established before throwing it away.

The second problem with progressives in the church is that “progress” often implies that subtle changes to the Gospel are required. For example, preachers who focus on social justice can imply that those that do not conform to the leader’s understanding of current social justice ideas are deficient in their understanding and application of the Gospel. I have personally sat under such preaching and it is annoying at best and heretical at worst.

I am concerned that in our efforts to conform to current notions of social justice, the church is damaging its witness by adapting its message to ideology that is not, at its core, Biblical.

I have heard this new way of looking at racial issues called critical race theory (CRT). I have not studied this enough to have a complete understanding of what this means, but it does seem to have infiltrated much of the church. I observe that CRT actually promotes rather than heals division between groups. If I am wrong in this understanding, feel free to offer correction in the comment section below.

Telling one group that they are inherently racist because of the color of their skin seems inherently racist to me. How ironic it is that those who are ostensibly fighting racism use methods that actually promote it by reversing the direction of its application. Are we trying to bring unity and restoration or are we merely trying to reverse the power structures?

When a church stops teaching that we are all in need of transformation and begins to teach that some need more transformation than others, that church has ceased preaching the true Gospel of Jesus Christ.

I understand that as a whole, the church has badly fallen short in obeying the second great command to love our neighbor as ourselves. The fact that Jesus called this a great command is an indication that we cannot possibly overemphasize this. Our application of this command should indeed transcend our differences as we seek to treat everyone with respect. It would not cause me heartburn if every sermon included an encouragement to obey this great command along with specific examples of how we can improve in obeying it. It is that important.

My problem with progressives and social justice warriors is that they are more often than not selective in how this is to be applied. Yes, we should be concerned that everyone gets treated fairly regardless of the color of their skin. But what about concern for the unborn who are killed by the thousands every day? What are we doing to solve the issues that cause homelessness? Are we going to stand up to the NEA to demand that alternative educational schemes be explored? Are we willing to examine all the ways that we fall short in how we love our neighbors or are we simply jumping on the current cultural bandwagon as a means of appearing hip and drawing people into the church?

The whole point of the reformation was to correct the “progress” that the church had made through the centuries. The progressives turned the church into something other than what Christ intended it to be.

Let’s not go down that path again.

Filed Under: Commentary

Easter Greetings 2021

Posted on April 4, 2021 Written by Mark McIntyre Leave a Comment

It has been nearly two whole months since I’ve posted. I hope that this note finds you well and I also hope that you have been encouraged by your celebration of the resurrection of Jesus Christ.

The short reason I haven’t written in a while is that I felt like I had nothing to say that would be helpful to anyone. I mostly write about the church and church leadership issues and I have gone through a period where I was very frustrated and not very positive in my outlook.

I have watched a man take control of what was a good church and turn it into a place where people get hurt and walk away wondering what happened to them. This pastor made a unilateral hiring decision that increased the rate of decline by bringing another pastor on staff who shared his progressive views and had the skills to politically maneuver around the elders who questioned the new direction.

I have watched as the elders who questioned the direction were demonized by the pastors to the point where their only recourse was to resign and walk away. In the past two years, seven elders have been pushed out the door. They hung in there as long as they could to protect the people assigned to their care, but eventually got to the point where they were no longer effective due to lies spread about them.

These are men that I would love to stand with shoulder-to-shoulder, encouraging people in the faith. Every one of them remains qualified for church leadership per the standards set by the Apostle Paul in 1 Timothy and Titus. They are godly men yet they were badly treated by the pastors.

These events have been so frustrating, I began wondering what role, if any, I would have in any church moving forward. At work, I expect leaders to be self-promoting, but this behavior should never be part of church life.

But then, Scripture reminds me that God remains in control and the knuckleheads that sometimes rise to the top in churches do not escape God’s notice. God has pronounced some very sobering statements about what happens to those who abuse His people (Jeremiah 23 comes to mind). I am reminded that I can leave this in God’s hands, he will handle it.

The Psalms are full of questions about why evil men seem to prosper while asking God how long he will wait before he acts. It seems that frustration with the status quo has been a nearly universal experience with the saints throughout the ages. Therefore I am encouraged that I am not alone and my prayers do not fall on deaf ears since God saw fit to include similar complaints in the Psalter.

And, I am reminded that God is patient with sinners and his delay is an opportunity for those in rebellion to repent. For God’s patience I am thankful since I am also one in need of grace and forgiveness.

But most of all, I am reminded this Easter that evil will not triumph despite how it looks in the moment. The one weapon of mass destruction our enemy can wield is death. Jesus’ resurrection proves that this weapon has been disarmed. By rising from the dead, Jesus proved he has the power to make things right and his promise to do so will be made good.

Jesus also promised to build his church. I am encouraged that Jesus is powerful enough to accomplish his purpose for the church even when leaders are perverting the gospel by adjusting it to conform it to current cultural norms.

Happy Easter! Jesus is alive and He will build His church. I’m beginning to regain excitement to see what it will look like.

Filed Under: Commentary

On the value of good preaching

Posted on August 14, 2019 Written by Mark McIntyre Leave a Comment

I recently ran across a post by Albert Mohler entitled The Urgency of Peaching that I found helpful. I found it helpful because it speaks to a concern that I have had for a while about what is considered acceptable in many churches with regard to preaching.

Those of us who run in reformed circles claim to believe that each of us carries the ongoing effect of the sin of our first parents. We are not as bad as we might be, but sin taints everything we do, think and say.

Furthermore, we know that we are often blind to our own need of transformation. Preachers should keep this in mind as we think about selecting a Bible passage for our sermon.

I am suspicious of those who think of topics which they would like to address and then go in search of a portion of the Bible that they can use as a springboard for their opinion on the subject.

There is value in taking a passage of Scripture and exploring what it says. There is danger is determining what we would like to say and finding Scripture to support it. I find that there is way too much of the latter coming from pulpits in American churches.

The difference between these two types of preaching is this. In the former, the preacher subjects himself to the text. He then seeks to understand and proclaim what the passage says. The preacher allows Scripture to be the judge of what is to be heard.

In the latter, the preacher (knowingly or unknowingly) places himself above the text and proclaims what he wants the congregation to hear or what he thinks they should hear. The preacher then makes himself out to be the judge of what is to be heard.

We can find many stories which illustrate this difference in the Old Testament. One of my favorites is that of Micaiah in 1 Kings 22. There we see the prophet Micaiah, who spoke the truth to Ahab, compared to the prophet Zedekiah, who spoke what Ahab wanted to hear.

If we really believe that the Bible is God’s verbal revelation to men and women, then we should take seriously the call to be subject to it through the ministry of preaching. This is as true for the person in the pulpit as for the person in the pew.

As a result of this thought process, I feel strongly that the best approach is to take a book of the Bible and preach through it line by line, and word by word. The beauty of this approach is that the preacher is not picking what he wants to say, but saying what the text demands him to say.

When you go to the doctor do you want him to tell you what you want to hear, or do you want him to tell you the truth? If your goal is to be healthy, you need to hear the truth even if it is disturbing so that corrective action can be taken if needed.

In the same way, we should expect our preacher to communicate to himself and to us the diagnosis that God makes upon our condition and the corrective action that God prescribes. We don’t need or want the preacher to interfere with this process by filtering out the inconvenient or disturbing bits.

Our spiritual health depends on this.

Filed Under: Commentary

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 8
  • Next Page »

Follow Attempts at Honesty

Honesty in your Inbox

Post Series

  • Westminster Shorter Catechism Series
  • Sermon on the Mount Series
August 2025
SMTWTFS
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31 
« Jul    

Categories

Archives

Blogger Grid
Follow me on Blogarama

Copyright © 2025 · Focus Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in