• Home
  • About This Blog
  • Contact Me
  • Subscribe
  • Comment Policy

Attempts at Honesty

Reflections on the interplay of the Bible and Culture

  • Westminster Shorter Catechism Series
  • Sermon on the Mount Series
Home Archives for atheism

No Other Gods . . .

Posted on April 1, 2011 Written by Mark McIntyre 3 Comments

The drive to worship is deep in the heart of humanity. For evidence of this we need to look no further than any stadium in which an NFL game is being played. The energy behind the worship of the professional football team in the city near which I live is impressive. On game day during football season, green jerseys are seemingly everywhere. Thousands flock to the stadium, to bars and to homes to gather for worship of their beloved team.

I’m not saying that it is wrong to be a sports fan, I am saying that the fervor displayed by many fans is evidence of man’s inherent need and capacity to worship.

Apart from the Judeo/Christian world view, objects of worship are people, things or concepts that have their existence in the physical world. In some cultures they worship idols and other objects that are considered sacred. In the western world of the 21st Century, many worship science and technology as the saviors of mankind. All these religions (modern atheism demands the same level of faith and commitment as any religion) are grounded in what can be apprehended through the physical senses.

Demands for proof of the existence of God are rooted in the physical realm. It is considered foolish to believe in something that cannot be seen or touched. Yet, that is what God expected of Israel and what he expects of us today, to believe in him. He sets himself up as the God who is above and beyond the physical world and is worthy of worship.

He does not leave us in the dark to grope our way to him. He, the one who created the physical realm and our ability to perceive it, has provided the means for us to gain knowledge of him. There are two means of apprehending God that I would like to highlight.

The first is his word as revealed by the Biblical authors. God has revealed himself to us in terms that we can understand. He is a God who wants to be known and he makes that clear to us. I cannot touch God in a physical sense, but I can handle his word given to me. I cannot hear God’s voice with my ear, but I can hear through his word.

The second is the revelation of God in the person of Jesus Christ. The Apostle John writes about the fact that Jesus could be seen, heard and touched. Jesus, as God in the flesh, revealed the nature of God to us in a way that we can understand. He, being fully human and fully God, could bridge the gap of separation between us and God in a way that no human could do. To look on the face of Jesus was to look on the face of God.

These thoughts were prompted by my reading of Exodus 20 this morning which contains the Ten Commandments. One of the commands is that no images are to be worshipped. Yet we see that humanity has had a bias toward worshipping what can be seen over the God who is unseen. God alone is to be worshipped but men refuse to bow to him, preferring to put their faith in other men or in science or in their own ability.

Men and science do not have a particularly good track record to date. The 20th Century was the bloodiest century on record. The century which had the greatest “freedom” from God had the most tyranny and destruction.

A common business proverb is, “the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.” Yet we keep denouncing God and trusting men and we are disappointed every time. I guess that means that as a culture we are insane . . .

Filed Under: Bible Reflection Tagged With: atheism, Jesus, Worship

Truth Whack a Mole

Posted on March 13, 2011 Written by Mark McIntyre 10 Comments

Whack-a-moleIn reading the “new” atheists, I see confirmation of the Apostle Paul’s assertion that their unbelief is not due to the lack of evidence but the suppression of it. There is a large difference between those who are truly seeking answers to difficult questions and those who are unwilling to believe no matter what the data suggest.

At times Jesus gave some hard answers to seekers (i.e. “go and sell all your possessions”) but was willing to engage them in a loving manner. He reserved his anger for those who came with certainty about their grasp of the truth. Every believer who pauses to reflect on the issues of life has moments of doubt and questions about what he has been taught and questions about what he observes in the culture around him. Contrary to what some think, doubts and questions are not condemned in Scripture, nor are they outside the experience of believers through the ages.

I have come to realize that those who refuse to believe (it is a will issue, first and foremost) have to spend a lot of energy whacking down those truth moles as they pop up. How are you going to respond to the claims Jesus made about himself? How could the complexity we see in biology happen by chance? Can you really live as though there are no absolute truths? Why is it that so many believe in the supernatural? These are examples of questions, like moles, that pop up and must be swept aside to remain antagonistic to belief. Those who are truly wrestling with these questions are more open to dialog.

Perhaps this is why the tone of several of the recent popular atheist manifestos is so angry. Maybe they’re tired of whacking those moles . . . .

Technorati Tags: Atheism,Christianity,truth,Jesus,Christ

Filed Under: Apologetics, Atheism Tagged With: Apostle Paul, atheism, Christ, Christianity, God, Jesus, Religion and Spirituality, Truth

Wanted: A Point of Reference

Posted on March 3, 2011 Written by Mark McIntyre 1 Comment

Traffic LightWhen you are sitting at a stop light in your car and see motion out of the corner of your eye, there are two responses. The first is to push harder on the brake pedal and the second is to look at a lamp post, building or some other stationary object to see if your car moving.

To gauge your own movement requires a fixed object as a point of reference.

In the same way, ethics or morality are only valid if there is some point of reference by which behaviors can be compared. There can be no discussion about ethics if there is not a shared moral code by which to judge.

If you start with the premise that there is no God and all that we see is a result of time plus chance, then statements about morality and ethics can only be expressions of preference since there is no basis on which to declare any particular behavior right or wrong.

It appears that a majority of those who espouse the mantra that “there are no absolute values” have not thought through the implications of this belief. If there are no absolute values, then there can be no real discourse to solve conflict. Conflict would then be resolved by the stronger dominating the weak. Do moral relativists really want to live by the evolutionary code of survival of the fittest? If this premise is true, on what basis would the Columbine shooters or the Virginia Tech shooter be condemned? Were they not doing what their DNA told them to do? Were they not pursuing what they thought was the best course of action? On what basis would Hitler or Stalin be condemned? Were they not doing what they thought was best for their respective countries?

Thankfully, these men have been almost universally condemned, but on what basis?

Tim Keller makes the point that if you start with a premise and the results are not in accordance with observed reality, the premise should then be reexamined. We can observe that a majority of people do not live as though there are no absolute values. We collectively value human life. We define some behavior as criminal and punish those who pursue it. Observed reality is that we do define some behavior as wrong, therefore the premise must be wrong.

There is something in humanity that seeks to know where to draw the line between acceptable and unacceptable behavior. Naturalism cannot explain this, nor can it provide a means of drawing that line.

But, if we start with the premise that we are here as a result of a creator God and that He has revealed to us universal principles by which we should live, then we have no problem explaining the desire for standards. In addition, such a God provides the point of reference by which the standards can be established. The premise of a creator God seems to better explain observed human behavior.

Filed Under: Apologetics, Christianity and Culture Tagged With: atheism, DNA, Ethics, God, Philosophy, Ravi Zacharias, Religion and Spirituality

Did God actually say . . . ?

Posted on February 14, 2011 Written by Mark McIntyre 1 Comment

ripe red apple with green leaf isolated on white From the first, our rebellion against God has taken the form of questioning the wisdom of His statements and prohibitions.

We see this today as popular atheists are lining up to ridicule God and the Bible. To do so requires that the atheist sets himself up as the authority as to what is right and proper. Sound familiar? This is exactly what happened in Genesis 3. Adam had the choice between listening to his wife or believing God. He chose the former and we’ve been choosing badly ever since.

Recently I saw two blog posts, one by Doug Geivett and the other by Chad Missildine, about Christians behaving like atheists. If I am honest (or attempting to be), I will admit that at times I choose my own way over God’s and in that moment, I am a functional atheist. I do not always act as if I believe that God is always with me. I do not always act as though God is the most important relationship in my life. I sometimes act as if I am the final authority and can stand in judgment of God and his word.

The point of this is that before we go on a verbal seek and destroy mission against atheists, we should look inside and see that the “did God say?” virus is still in our system and will not be completely eradicated until we are with Jesus. This reflection should put is in a better position to present truth in a loving way. It is easier to be loving when we realize that the atheist is living out what we would be without the work of the Holy Spirit in our hearts.

The first atheist to conquer is the one in the mirror.

Filed Under: Apologetics, Bible Reflection Tagged With: atheism

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Next Page »

Follow Attempts at Honesty

Honesty in your Inbox

Post Series

  • Westminster Shorter Catechism Series
  • Sermon on the Mount Series
August 2025
SMTWTFS
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31 
« Jul    

Categories

Archives

Blogger Grid
Follow me on Blogarama

Copyright © 2025 · Focus Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in