• Home
  • About This Blog
  • Contact Me
  • Subscribe
  • Comment Policy

Attempts at Honesty

Reflections on the interplay of the Bible and Culture

  • Westminster Shorter Catechism Series
  • Sermon on the Mount Series
Home Archives for Bible Reflection

Failure: The Unintended Consequence of Success

Posted on July 30, 2014 Written by Todd Pylant 1 Comment

This is a guest post by Todd Pylant whose biographical information appears in the author box below this post. If you would like to provide a guest post to Attempts at Honesty, please see the guest post guidelines and contact me if you are interested in providing a post.

Success and FailureThe writer of Hebrews demonstrated faith in action by highlighting the life of faithful men and women throughout biblical history. The famous “faith hall of fame,” otherwise known as chapter 11, is full of great faith stories like Abraham and Moses. But it also includes a list of names, stories that the author didn’t have the time to tell. One of those un-expounded faith stories is the story of Gideon.

Gideon’s story is found in Judges 6-8. He was the unlikely man chosen by God to deliver Israel from the hand of the Midianites. Though he was the least in his father’s house, the angel of the Lord told him to “go in this might of yours and save Israel.” In faith, Gideon destroyed his own father’s altar to Baal. The Spirit of the lord clothed Gideon, he rallied Israel around him, and gathered for battle. He famously sought confirmation from the Lord through the fleece, twice. And he trusted in God’s plan, even though the Lord whittled his fighting force down to a paltry 300 men and gave him a battle plan about a silly as Joshua’s: torches, trumpets, and clay jars. But “through faith,” Gideon “conquered kingdoms, enforced justice, and obtained promises” (see Hebrews 11.33).

So great was his victory, that the people wanted to make him king, but Gideon boldly refused. “I will not rule over you. The Lord will rule over you” (Judges 8.23). A great man with great faith. And as long as Gideon was alive, the land had rest.

But there was one small “but”…

After the least of his family turned into the mighty warrior, after the oppressed farmer turned into a cultural icon, after the man who had seen none of God’s wonderful deeds had seen too many wonderful deeds to count, after all that, Gideon stumbled. After refusing to become king, he asked each soldier to give to him a portion of the spoils in war. And with this gold and purple garments,

Gideon made an ephod of it and put it in his city, in Ophrah. And all Israel whored after it there, and it became a snare to Gideon and to his family. (Judges 8.27)

In the words of Keith Jackson, “Whoa Nellie!” The ephod was the priestly garment worn by the descendants of Aaron (see Exodus 28.1-5). Gideon committee two major errors. First, he took upon himself a role that was given to the priests. He was of the tribe of Mannasseh, not a descendant of Aaron. He was called by God to be a judge, not a priest. He assumed that success in one role gave him the freedom to step into any role he wanted.

Second, he enabled the people to violate the second commandment. He made an image, and whether he intended for it to happen or not, the people worshipped it. The word translated “whored after it” is a word used to describe the adultery and immorality of worshipping pagan gods. Because Gideon didn’t stop the people from doing the very thing that got them in the mess in the first place, it became a snare to him, his family, and ultimately, the nation as a whole.

What we see in Gideon is a very powerful principle of faith, one that we would be wise to heed: failure often follows success. When God does great things through people, pride often rises up and leads them into great failure. Consider David’s success and subsequent failure with Bathsheba. Consider Hezekiah’s deliverance and subsequent prideful display of wealth. Consider Elijah’s triumphant stand on Mount Carmel and subsequent fearful foot race. What once made us useable for God’s great work, our humility, now makes us dangerous to our own future: our pride.

The faith story of Gideon challenges us to work hard to not allow whatever form of success we might experience to lead us onto the prideful path of failure.

Filed Under: Bible Reflection, Guest Post Tagged With: failure, Gideon, success

No basis for discourse

Posted on July 28, 2014 Written by Mark McIntyre 4 Comments

DiscourseIf I say that I like red cars, it is not logical to conclude that I think that all non-red cars should be immediately assigned to the scrap pile. It is true that I like red cars, but for a variety of reasons, none of the cars that are currently in my driveway are red. I don’t hate non-red cars. A positive statement about one color of car is not an implied hatred of all other colors. To think so is a logical fallacy.

But on several hot-button issues in our day, this understanding of logic seems to be lost on the political pundits and media personalities.

What brought this to mind is the “controversial” hiring of David Tyree by the New York Giants. David has gone on record saying that he is of the opinion that marriage should be between one man and one woman. This is a positive statement. But somehow this gets construed as hate speech by those who support gay marriage. A few years ago, we has the same bustle over statements may by Dan Cathy of Chick-fil-a.

No evidence has been presented that either Dan Cathy or David Tyree has issued threats or said anything that would put anyone in the LGBT community at risk. David Tyree is not preventing anyone from pursuing what they think will make them happy. He simply made some statements about what he thinks is true and optimum for humanity.

We seem to have gotten to the point in our society where we can no longer have civil discourse. If someone makes a claim for truth, rather than take on his arguments and present counter arguments, it is much easier to just label his opinion as hateful and thereby wrong. It is easier to discredit the messenger than to respond to the message.

But that sword should cut both ways. Why then is it not wrong for comedians like Bill Maher to make derogatory comments about Christians and other people of faith? Is it too much to ask that those who preach tolerance would be sure that those who support their point of view do so in a tolerant manner?

Apparently it is too much to ask.

But fear not. I am reminded that when Paul wrote most of his letters, Nero was the Emperor. The conditions arranged against faith in general and Christianity in particular were formidable. But two observations should be made:

  1. Paul spent no time complaining or otherwise advocating that Christians seek or wield political power to bring societal change.
  2. All the might of Rome could not quench the truth and Christianity spread despite the efforts to stamp it out.

Jesus said, “For truly, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass from the Law until all is accomplished” (Matt. 5:18). If Jesus is who he claimed to be, no redefinition of marriage, no labeling of belief as hatred, no intolerance can thwart what God has purposed.

As we consider the injustice of how Christians get lampooned in the media, we need to take seriously Jesus’ command to turn the other cheek (Matt. 5:39) and Paul’s command to speak the truth in love (Eph. 4:15).

Paul expected, and received opposition. Why should we expect it to be any different for us?

Filed Under: Bible Reflection Tagged With: discourse

Which are wheat and which are tares?

Posted on July 11, 2014 Written by Mark McIntyre 5 Comments

Wheat and TaresIn Matthew 13 we find Jesus relating the story of the wheat and the tares.

The master instructed his servants to wait until the end before they remove the tares so that the wheat can come to full maturity before harvesting.

The point that I’ve heard made from the pulpit more often than not is that we should not be surprised by the tares and that there will be unbelievers in the church. While I agree that this is a legitimate interpretation of the story, another thought comes to mind.

My experience is that sometimes there are people who have come to faith in such a gradual way, that it may be difficult to distinguish wheat from tares. What if the delay is not to only protect the wheat but to allow the harvesters to more accurately identify the tares.

I think that in churches we are often too eager to determine who is in and who is out. We are quick to apply litmus tests to faith.

The danger is that it is very possible to have intellectual assent to correct doctrine, but still be without a true relationship with God. Jesus speaks about this at the end of the Sermon on the Mount, when he says, “many will say to me in that day . . .” (Matthew 7:22). Paul encouraged the Corinthians to test themselves to see if they are of the faith (2 Corinthians 13:5).

Notice that they are to test themselves, not test each other.

Yes, I believe that correct doctrine is important. But correct doctrine is a means, not an end. The end goal of correct doctrine is to bring us into deeper relationship with Jesus Christ. If we make correct doctrine the goal, then we will build walls rather than tear them down.

God is in the business of turning tares into wheat. What if the reason that we are not to separate the tares is for the purpose of bringing some of those who have not yet responded to the gospel into the kingdom of God?

Filed Under: Bible Reflection Tagged With: tares, wheat

Love and the Cross

Posted on July 4, 2014 Written by Mark McIntyre 2 Comments

Love and the Cross“Only love for Christ has the power to incapacitate the sturdy love for self that is the bane of every sinner, and only the grace of Christ has the power to produce that love” – Paul David Tripp

Tripp goes on to point out that death of self is a prerequisite to fulling loving Christ. Jesus tells us in Luke 9:23 that we are required to daily take up our own cross. This is not a one and done type event but a continual process that requires discipline.

It was love for us that put Jesus on the Cross. It is love for Jesus that compels us toward our own cross. It is love for Jesus that motivates us to die to self. Love always involves a cross; love requires the death of our own desires for the sake of the one we love.

I know that I have only a partial understanding of what it means to take up my cross. What would it look like if I died a complete death to self? My self is a stubborn old coot and refuses to die.

Consider these verses from Paul:

“I have been crucified with Christ. It is no longer I who live, but Christ who lives in me. And the life I now live in the flesh I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me.” (Galatians 2:20, ESV)

“And so, from the day we heard, we have not ceased to pray for you, asking that you may be filled with the knowledge of his will in all spiritual wisdom and understanding,” (Colossians 1:9, ESV)

One takeaway from these verses is that while I must participate by taking up my own cross, I cannot do it in my own strength and wisdom. Christ must empower me to do so. It was Jesus’ love that bound him to his cross on my behalf and it is his love that can propel me toward my own cross. As David Trip reminds us in the quotation above, only Christ’s love can conquer my stubborn self-love. Apart from his love, I have no available power to conquer my pride and self absorption.

Filed Under: Bible Reflection Tagged With: Cross, Love

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • …
  • 150
  • Next Page »

Follow Attempts at Honesty

Honesty in your Inbox

Post Series

  • Westminster Shorter Catechism Series
  • Sermon on the Mount Series
January 2026
SMTWTFS
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Dec    

Categories

Archives

Blogger Grid
Follow me on Blogarama

Copyright © 2026 · Focus Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in